I was hoping to get more clarification on the following: I have a large number of dindex and dblock files from an interrupted backup. The backup was close to being completed so they should contain a good amount of data. Unfortunately I have lost access to the original data and these dindex and dblock files are all that remains. There were no dlist files created. I have attempted using the cli recovery tool but get the following error when using the restore command:
Program crashed:
System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no elements
at System.Linq.Enumerable.First[TSource](IEnumerable1 source) at Duplicati.CommandLine.RecoveryTool.Restore.Run(List1 args, Dictionary`2 options, IFilter filter)
at Duplicati.CommandLine.RecoveryTool.Program.RealMain(String[] _args)
Would there be any way to get around this and restore part of my data? I have tried the python script and it seems to not do anything when pointed to my data. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
what do you mean by that ? I hope that you understand that to use this script, you need to download the files from your remote backend and get it on a local drive.
EDIT: I missed the part where you said that you don’t have any dlist files. You can’t hope to recover from a Duplicati backup where there are no dlist files. No list of files backed up == what you have is a bunch of binary data without any pointer to file names. That said, your backup data was the result of a first time backup, otherwise it would have already some dlist files.
If that includes the entire drive with your user profile, then you probably lost the database as well.
Your data is available in default 100 KB blocks if tiny pieces will help without any reassembly map,
which would be from either dlist files or the database. There’s actually a bit of help in the dindex by
having blocklist information which can help form files you could rummage in, but names are in dlist.
Restore Backup with only dblock and dindex files was a similar dilemma, and I remembered a tool
had been made, but I had forgotten that a database was found and it used that, not the raw dindex.
It might be possible (if somebody has the time and skill) to bend an existing tool into just assigning
placeholder names to files, if it can put the files together from blocks (which would be a large help).
Do you do Python? If so, you could be the one who makes the tool you need, with some guidance.
To illustrate, I backed up a ten-block file whose blocks are identified by 32 byte hashes in a dindex.
The blocks are NUL because they’re from a past test, but basically after Base64 it’s a file in dblock. https://cryptii.com/pipes/hex-to-base64 of the SHA-256 f627ca4c2c322f15db26152df306bd4f983f0146409b81a4341b9b340c365a16
is (I’m using their RFC 4648 version which might be the right one – need something filename-safe)
9ifKTCwyLxXbJhUt8wa9T5g_AUZAm4GkNBubNAw2WhY
and here it is in the dblock .zip file:
and grep can also help if you know what strings could help take you to whatever data you’re after.
If you have the space, you could unzip all the dblock files to a folder and go see what you can get.
That would be OK for single-block (default 100 KB) files. Large ones would benefit from assembly however this could be done by concatenating the blocks that you obtained from unzips of dblocks.
Duplicati Database recreate performance has more hints and a Python script if there’s a volunteer
wishing to extend it into a super-emergency recovery tool or maybe someday a blocksize changer.
Changing blocksize might start with what you need, which is extracting your existing files, however
blocksize change (which you don’t need here) would also require repackaging them into new ones.
Is this still of interest? One bit of somewhat good news is I found a program TrID - File Identifier that can guess-add a file extension for formats it knows.
You’d still be on your own with inventing file names and sorting out versions.
You’d get every version of every file (basically the entire backup) to sort out.
This also assumes that the unfinished backup has no other problems with it.
My understanding of what’s maybe “normal” is also evolving as I look at this.
Part of my hope here is to be able to find “not-normal” quickly to quickly look.
