# No RPM built for v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09
**URL:** https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250
**Category:** Releases
**Created:** [July 10, 2020, 5:13am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250 "2020-07-10T05:13:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Taomyn](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/Taomyn)
#### Post date: [July 10, 2020, 5:13am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/1 "2020-07-10T05:13:31Z")
I got my Github alert for a new canary release and waited a while to be sure the build process completed, but I still don’t see a “.rpm” release?
There was no notification on the forum either, hopefully just got missed.
---
### Author:  [@tigro11](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/tigro11)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 8:34am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/2 "2020-07-15T08:34:41Z")
Good morning,
I wanted to warn that NOD32 antivirus gives me a malware error when I install duplicates.
Regards
Valerio
---
### Author:  [@ts678](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/ts678)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 10:56am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/3 "2020-07-15T10:56:33Z")
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> NOD32 antivirus gives me a malware error
On what file? The installer (if so, which one?) or something it installed during installation (if so, which file)?
[https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/releases/download/v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09/duplicati-2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09-x64.msi](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/releases/download/v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108_canary_2020-07-09/duplicati-2.0.5.108_canary_2020-07-09-x64.msi)
has no problem with any of the many scanners used (including an ESET one) when scanned by [VirusTotal](https://www.virustotal.com).
Just in case a not-very-capable scanner can’t scan an installer, I also tried the .zip file version. It scans fine.
You can submit whatever file you downloaded (unless it’s an autoupdate one, which would be harder to do).
Does NOD32 give you any sort of detail about why it’s complaining, what category of malware, and so on?
[[KB141] Submit a virus, website or potential false positive sample to the ESET lab](https://support.eset.com/en/kb141-submit-a-virus-website-or-potential-false-positive-sample-to-the-eset-lab) and other channels can help you try to get around what possibly is a false positive, but in any case seems to be getting in your way.
Were you on [2.0.5.107\_canary\_2020-05-26](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/releases/tag/v2.0.5.107-2.0.5.107_canary_2020-05-26) before, installed the same way and without any such warning?
[2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/releases/tag/v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108_canary_2020-07-09) changes seen here don’t look like that much but did add one more backend.
---
### Author:  [@tigro11](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/tigro11)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 12:09pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/5 "2020-07-15T12:09:08Z")
the file that gives the error is story\_uplink.dll suspicious file executed deletion.
How come the size doubled?
Is it possible in the future to have the installation option also as a service?
Thank you
Valerio
---
### Author:  [@ts678](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/ts678)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 1:01pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/6 "2020-07-15T13:01:01Z")
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> the file that gives the error is story\_uplink.dll
No such file exists. If you mean storj\_uplink.dll, can you tell which one? There seem to be 3 of them now, whereas 2.0.5.107 only had one in the main .dll folder. 2.0.5.108 has some in subfolders, which might be because it was built differently to try to avoid pulling in lots of System.\* .dll files, which may be next issue:
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> How come the size doubled?
Size of what, compared to which old version? The storj\_uplink.dll sizes didn’t double, but there are more:
2.0.5.107
main
10,867,712 bytes
2.0.5.108
main
10,642,432 bytes
win-x86
9,273,344 bytes
win-x64
10,642,432 bytes
If you mean the entire installation size, it roughly doubled:
2.0.5.107
59.5 MB
2.0.5.108
110 MB
[2.0.5.107 ships lots of Microsoft .dll files #4234](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/4234) was the investigation that led to changes in the storj (Tardigrade) backend in 2.0.5.108, but now the new [2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/releases/tag/v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108_canary_2020-07-09) addition with the
Tencent Cloud Object Storage (COS) backend looks to be the suspect, at least for the System .dlls.
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> Is it possible in the future to have the installation option also as a service?
This is clinching my thought that you’re using this “No RPM built” as a general 2.0.5.108 topic, maybe because new releases haven’t recently been announced in [Releases](https://forum.duplicati.com/c/releases/10). This is also being investigated.
As for the Service, can I assume you mean Windows (in spite of RPM topic)? If so, it’s certainly been discussed, however development speed are completely limited by volunteers and the skills they bring.
Surprisingly [Features category](https://forum.duplicati.com/c/features/6) doesn’t show such an enhancement request, but I didn’t look too hard.
You can certainly do your own research, start new topics, add your voice to existing ones, and so on.
[Update Windows installer to offer the choice of installing the Windows service #1738](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/1738) is a GitHub one.
Although you wouldn’t know it from topic’s title, there’s an installation suggestion at the following post:
[Duplicati Tray Icon Silently Dies with --no-hosted-server arg #3137](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/3137#issuecomment-590853229) (service is too do-it-yourself now).
---
### Author:  [@tigro11](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/tigro11)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 1:58pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/7 "2020-07-15T13:58:39Z")
this is the file C:\Program Files\Duplicati 2\win-x86\storj\_uplink.dll
yes the development for the service is for windows.
You said there aren’t many people for duplicate development, that’s why it’s not a good backup program?
in the future I would like that the reports sent via email were like those of veeam backup, with a green bar if the backup was successful, orange with problems found, red when the backup was not successful.
We wait confidently
Anyway thanks to all the duplicate developers.
Thanks
---
### Author:  [@ts678](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/ts678)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 2:21pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/8 "2020-07-15T14:21:53Z")
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> You said there aren’t many people for duplicate development, that’s why it’s not a good backup program?
> in the future I would like that the reports sent via email were like those of veeam backup
I said nothing about it being good or not, but did speak to development speed. Staff is not like Veeam:
[Insight Partners to Acquire Swiss Cloud Data Management Leader Veeam in a Transaction Valued at Approximately US$5 Billion](https://www.veeam.com/news/insight-partners-to-acquire-swiss-cloud-data-management-leader-veeam-in-a-transaction-valued-at-approximately-5-billion-dollars.html)
> [@tigro11](#):
>
> with a green bar if the backup was successful, orange with problems found, red when the backup was not successful.
You get the colors one click down (except middle one is yellow not orange – Tray Icon changes color too).
[Viewing the log files of a backup job](https://duplicati.readthedocs.io/en/latest/03-using-the-graphical-user-interface/#viewing-the-log-files-of-a-backup-job). Please submit feature requests in Features category, not Releases, where nobody will find them in this RPM topic. Such request may also be appropriate for the [UX category](https://forum.duplicati.com/c/ux/13).
[Simple web UI design study](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/simple-web-ui-design-study/10148) is talking about some changes. You could try proposing the idea that you like, however a screenshot or web link would clarify what you have in mind. Please do NOT continue that here.
EDIT:
Sorry, you asked about emails. You might look at third-party reports like [Duplicati Monitoring](https://www.duplicati-monitoring.com/) or [dupReport](https://github.com/HandyGuySoftware/dupReport/wiki). Both claim to do pretty reports, are doing enhancements of various sorts, and have threads on this forum.
---
### Author:  [@tigro11](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/tigro11)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 2:39pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/9 "2020-07-15T14:39:19Z")
perfect
thanks
Valerio
---
### Author:  [@tigro11](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/tigro11)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2020, 8:16pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/10 "2020-07-15T20:16:22Z")
information, the storj\_uplink.dll library is used to send the email?
do not send me the report email
---
### Author:  [@Taomyn](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/Taomyn)
#### Post date: [July 16, 2020, 8:01am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/no-rpm-built-for-v2-0-5-108-2-0-5-108-canary-2020-07-09/10250/11 "2020-07-16T08:01:07Z")
Create issue on Github [No RPM built for v2.0.5.108-2.0.5.108\_canary\_2020-07-09 · Issue #4253 · duplicati/duplicati · GitHub](https://github.com/duplicati/duplicati/issues/4253)