# Most cost efficient backend for about 300GB

**URL:** https://forum.duplicati.com/t/most-cost-efficient-backend-for-about-300gb/125
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Tags:** hosting-services
**Created:** [August 17, 2017, 12:22pm UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/most-cost-efficient-backend-for-about-300gb/125 "2017-08-17T12:22:40Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kenkendk](https://forum.duplicati.com/user_avatar/forum.duplicati.com/kenkendk/32/5305_2.png) [@kenkendk](https://forum.duplicati.com/u/kenkendk)
#### Post date: [August 18, 2017, 8:32am UTC](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/most-cost-efficient-backend-for-about-300gb/125/5 "2017-08-18T08:32:55Z")

</div>

I use S3 for my backups. I would not recommend using Glacier, it is too much of a hassle. The downside to S3 is the bandwidth costs, the storage itself is fairly priced.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.duplicati.com/t/most-cost-efficient-backend-for-about-300gb/125)._