Hello everyone! Our second beta version is now available at duplicati.com . A complete list of changes can be found at Duplicati - Changelog on Github . Here is a summary of the major changes: We introduced a smart retention policy. This means that backups are retained based on their age. The defaul…

I see the message for beta: “Don’t use with important data.”. May be time to remove this text or at least move to Canary?

I had some trouble updating from an earlier 2.x beta: at first I got error messages and no working UI, tried to downgrade again to retain function, then UI could not connect to the server. Back to 2.3.3 and then the app would not start at all w/out error messages. Then wanted to try to uninstall and…

[Capture] Nothing running, so I’m guessing I have to delete my existing scheduled backups. Not fun.

[image] AndreasGiesen: Is there a “best practice” when updating between betas? Not really - there were a number of update changes / improvements made between the 2.0.2.1 and 2.0.3.3 betas. Unfortunately, for SOME users this caused issues like you experienced. It happened once on a Windows 1…

There’s a year old bug that restores don’t work with non-standard block sizes. Non-standard block sizes are very useful in some scenarios. Inability to restore seems like a fairly big problem for a backup tool. Are there any plans to fix that bug at any point? I stopped using Duplicati due to that b…

It took a while, but I’ve finally been able to set smart retention policy in the new beta. Initially the setting wasn’t saved, it went back to previous setting whenever I exited options dialog and entered again. Then, I found that setting “Keep all backups” was the only choice being saved. Finally, …

Smart Retention looks great! Yet another item off my Duplicati wishlist…

It looks like it is a parsing/logic issue. If you look at the comments, you can fix the problem by setting the block size manually (and remember to put a B at the end so it is not parsed as MB). That said, we really should fix small issues like that, unfortunately, my time is limited.

Is there going to be updates on the experimental channel bring safe fixes (such as the symbolic link fix) without the riskier changes (such as multi-threading)? Or is another beta coming soon? Basically, how can I get the latest fixes without the risks of running canary? Thanks!

[image] sylerner: Is there going to be updates on the experimental channel bring safe fixes (such as the symbolic link fix) without the riskier changes (such as multi-threading)? I had not planned on that, but I guess that we could cherry pick some of the minor changes into a new experimental…

Duplicati

2nd beta version of Duplicati 2.0 now available

Announcements

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled